Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Finding and Evaluating Scholarly Sources: Criteria for Evaluating Sources

This guide will introduce you to scholarly resources you will need for your research assignments; Scholarly and Popular Publications-journals, magazines, newspapers; and define primary and secondary sources.

Additional Tips for Evaluating Specific Source Types

Books

  • Look at the publication date. Is the information current enough for your purposes?
  • Look at where the book was published.  If published at a University Press or U.S. Government Printing Office, that could be an indicator of scholary content

Articles

  • Is biographical information for the author provided?
  • Who is the publisher?
  • How frequently is the perodical published?
  • How many and what kinds of advertisements are present? For example, is the advertising clearly geared toward readers ina specific discipline or occupation?

Web Pages

  • What is the domain of the web page? (e.g., com, .net, .gov)
  • Who is publishing or sponsoring the page?
  • Strip back the URL to discover the source of the page.
  • Is contact information for the author/publisher provided?
  • How recently ws the page updated?
  • Be particularly wary fo bias when viewing web pages. Anyone can create a web page about any topic. You must verify the validity of the information.

 

Points to Remember

  • Both magazine and journal articles can be good sources for your work.
  • When selecting articles, think about how you intend to use the information.
  •    Do you want background on a topic new to you? (use a magazine)
  •    Did your teacher say to cite scholarly resources? (use journals)
  • Often a combination of the two will be msot appropriate for undergraduate research.

CRAAP Test

Currency : the timeliness of the information

  • If relevant, when was the information gathered?
  • When was it posted?
  • When was it last revised?
  • Are links functional and up-to-date?
  • Is there evidence of newly added information or links?

Relevance : the uniqueness of the content and its importance for your needs.

  • What is the depth and breadth of the information presented?
  • Is the information unique?
  • Is it available elsewhere, in print or electronic format?
  • Could you find the same or better information in another source?
  • Who is the intended audience? Is this easily determined?
  • Does the site provide the information you need? Your overall assessment is important. Would you be comfortable using this source for a research paper?

Authority : the source of the information

  • Who is the author/creator/sponsor?
  • Are author's credentials listed?
  • Is the author a teacher or student of the topic? Does the author have a reputation?
  • Is there contact information, such as an e-mail address? Has the author published works in traditional formats?
  • Is the author affiliated with an organization? Does this organization appear to support or sponsor the page?

Accuracy: the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the information

  • Where does the information come from?
  • Are the original sources of information listed?
  • Can you verify any of the information in independent sources or from your own knowledge?
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
  • Does the language or tone seem biased?
  • Are there spelling, grammar, or other typos?

Purpose : the presence of bias or prejudice

  • Are possible biases clearly stated?
  • Is advertising content vs. informational content easily distinguishable?
  • Are editorials clearly labeled?
  • Is the purpose of the page stated?
  • Is the purpose to: inform? teach? entertain? enlighten? sell? persuade?

Source - Meriam Library at California State University, Chico: http://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf